A Comparative Study of Radiomic and Connectomic Approaches to Classification of IDH1 Status and 1p/19q Co-deletion in Lower Grade Gliomas
Paradkar, R. V.; Alterman, R. L.
Show abstract
PurposeGrade III and IV brain tumors are labeled "high grade", or malignant. Lower grade tumors (grade II and III) can progress to high grade and must be closely monitored. In lower grade gliomas, the presence of a specific IDH1 gene mutation and the 1p/19q chromosomal co-deletion confer favorable prognosis and alternative treatment strategy. Presently, these markers are evaluated using surgically obtained tissue specimens. In this study, we evaluate noninvasive approaches to classification of these genetic markers. We hypothesized that connectomic and radiomic approaches to classification would perform similarly. We also tested combined classification, incorporating radiomics and connectomics. MethodsBinary classifiers used radiomic and connectomic features from MRI to classify IDH1 and 1p/19q co-deletion status. Radiomic features were calculated to characterize tumor gray-level, texture, and shape. Voxel-based morphometry was performed to create gray-matter structural connectomes. Nodal efficiencies of brain regions, number of nodes and connections were computed. Binary classifiers predicted IDH1 and 1p/19q co-deletion status. Statistical analysis quantified differences in model performance. ResultsConnectomic and radiomic features had insignificant difference in classification of IDH1 status. Radiomic and connectomic classification of 1p/19q co-deletion status had no significant accuracy difference, however, radiomics had significantly higher AUC score. The combined approach had no significant difference to radiomics and connectomics except for a significantly higher AUC score than connectomics in 1p/19q co-deletion classification. ConclusionAltogether, the study shows that radiomics, connectomics, and a combination of the two are viable classification approaches for these markers. Future studies could incorporate these methods to improve diagnostic performance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between pathological brain activity and functional network connectivity in glioma patients 92%
- Association of Extent of Resection and Functional Outcomes in Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis 92%
- Early Imaging Marker of Progressive Glioblastoma: a window of opportunity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of IDH Mutation Status In Brain Gliomas 97%
- A non-local diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tract density biomarker to stratify, predict, and interpret survival rates in human glioblastoma 92%
- A subset of pediatric thalamic gliomas share a distinct DNA methylation profile, H3K27me3 loss and frequent alteration of EGFR 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 96%
- Predicting Prognosis and IDH Mutation Status for Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas Using Whole Slide Images 95%
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 97%
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 96%
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of 1p/19q Co-Deletion Status In Brain Gliomas 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image-localized Biopsy Mapping of Brain Tumor Heterogeneity: A Single-Center Study Protocol 93%
- Image-based metric of invasiveness predicts response to adjuvant temozolomide for primary glioblastoma 92%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.