Back

Merging logical models: An application in Acute Myeloid Leukemia modeling

Li, L. X.; Aguilar, B.; Gennari, J.; Qin, G.

2024-09-19 systems biology
10.1101/2024.09.13.612961 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationGene regulatory network (GRN) models provide mechanistic understanding of genetic interactions that regulate gene expression and, consequently, influence cellular behavior. Dysregulated gene expression plays a critical role in disease progression and treatment response, making GRN models a promising tool for precision medicine. While researchers have built many models to describe specific subsets of gene interactions, more comprehensive models that cover a broader range of genes are challenging to build. This necessitates the development of automated approaches for merging existing models. ResultsWe present LM-Merger, a workflow for semi-automatically merging logical GRN models. The workflow consists of five main steps: (a) model identification, (b) model standardization and annotation, (c) model verification, (d) model merging, and (d) model evaluation. We demonstrate the feasibility and benefit of this workflow with two pairs of published models pertaining to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The integrated models were able to retain the predictive accuracy of the original models, while expanding coverage of the biological system. Notably, when applied to a new dataset, the integrated models outperformed the individual models in predicting patient response. This study highlights the potential of logical model merging to advance systems biology research and our understanding of complex diseases. Availability and implementationThe workflow and accompanying tools, including modules for model standardization, automated logical model merging, and evaluation, are available at https://github.com/IlyaLab/LogicModelMerger/.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.