Back

Challenges in the Accurate Modelling of Lipid Dynamics in Monolayers and Bilayers

Tempra, C.; Chamorro, V. C.; Mandal, T.; Chiantia, S.; Vogele, M.; Fabian, B.; Javanainen, M.

2024-09-13 biophysics
10.1101/2024.09.12.612735 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in hydrodynamic theory have revealed the severe effect of periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on the diffusive dynamics of lipid membranes in molecular dynamics simulations. Even when accounting for PBC effects, the corrected lipid diffusion coefficients often severely overshoot the experimental estimates. Here, we investigate the underlying reasons for the exaggerated dynamics, and suggest potential ways for improvement. To this end, we examine the diffusion of four lipid types in both bilayers and monolayers using the CHARMM36 force field. We account for PBC effects using the full hydrodynamic treatment: for bilayers we use non-equilibrium simulations to extract the interleaflet friction parameter used in the correction; whereas monolayer hydrodynamics are treated by setting this parameter to zero. Our results suggest that the dynamics of bilayers are too fast, even if interleaflet friction is accounted for. However, the change of the water model to OPC leads to an excellent agreement with experiments. For monolayers, the dynamics with the TIP3P water model agree well with experiments, whereas they are undershot with OPC. As OPC and TIP3P differ in both shear viscosity and surface tension, we develop two new mass-scaled water models to clarify the roles of the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the water model on lipid dynamics. Our results indicate that both of these quantities play a major role in lipid dynamics. Moreover, it seems that the accurate description of diffusion in both lipid bilayers and monolayers cannot be accounted for by changes in the water model alone, but likely also requires modifications in the lipid model.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.8%
2
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
10
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
13
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
15
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
22
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%