Back

Towards explaining the fertility gap in farmed Pekin ducks

Beyts, C. H.; Wright, J.; Araya-Ajoy, Y.; Watson, K.

2024-09-17 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.09.12.612586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maximising reproductive success is crucial to animal production systems, particularly in meeting global demands for animal products and improving commercially important traits. However, while social interactions and mating strategies are known to influence reproductive success in wild populations, their consideration in agricultural systems remains limited. Using an interdisciplinary framework that combines concepts from behavioural ecology and quantitative genetics in an animal breeding context, we investigated the role of sperm limitation and polygynous mating strategies (female polyandry, male monopolisation of females and male polygamy) in limiting female reproductive success in farmed Pekin ducks (Anas platyrthynchos domestica). We assessed the impact of these behaviours on chick production and quantified their genetic and environmental (co)variance. Our results revealed that the number of dam mates positively influenced chick production in female ducks. However, contrary to our expectation, skew in chick paternity (our measure of male monopolisation) was associated with increased female chick production, challenging the hypothesis that male monopolisation limits the sperm available to females and reduces their reproductive success. We found no evidence that male polygamy led to decreased female chick production. Genetic analysis revealed that female mate number and reproductive skew exhibit genetic variance, providing opportunities for targeted selection to enhance chick production. However, there was a negative genetic association between female polyandry and skew in chick paternity, suggesting a trade-off between these traits that would need to be considered in future selection programmes. Our findings highlight how concepts from behavioural ecology can be incorporated into breeding programmes, providing new opportunities to develop effective and sustainable breeding strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
7
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
8
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
17
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Genetics Selection Evolution
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%