Back

Association of Parental Prenatal Mental Health on Offspring Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kepinska, A. P.; Smout, S.; Robakis, T.; Cohen, L.; Gustavsson Mahjani, I. C.; Skalkidou, A.; Bergink, V.; Mahjani, B.

2024-09-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.09.12.24313571 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveParental prenatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) are linked to child neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), but evaluations of the magnitude and mechanisms of this association are limited. This study estimates the strength of the association and whether it is impacted by genetic and environmental factors. MethodA systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, OVID, and Google Scholar was performed for articles published from January 1988 to January 2024. Of 2,170 articles screened, 64 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted on 20 studies, and 44 were included in the narrative synthesis. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, along with tests for heterogeneity (I{superscript 2}) and publication bias (Eggers test). The review followed PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. ResultsMaternal PMADs were associated with a significantly increased risk of ADHD (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.52) and ASD (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.37-1.81) in children. Paternal PMADs were also associated with the risk of NDDs, with combined odds for ASD and ADHD (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.34). Several studies suggested that the link between parental PMADs and offspring NDDs might be impacted by both genetic and environmental factors, including the impact of ongoing parental depression on child behavior. Conclusions and RelevanceParental PMADs are significantly associated with an increased risk of NDDs in children. These associations may be influenced by both genetic predispositions and environmental factors. Understanding these pathways is important for informing interventions aimed at mitigating mental health risks in families and supporting child development.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.