Forecasting local surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations through adaptive decision tree classifiers
Murray-Watson, R. E.; Bilinski, A.; Yaesoubi, R.
Show abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many communities across the US experienced surges in hospitalizations, which strained the local hospital capacity and affected the overall quality of care. Even when effective vaccines became available, many communities remained at high risk of surges in COVID-19-related hospitalizations due to waning immunity, low uptake of booster vaccinations, and the continual emergence of new variations of SARS-CoV-2. Some risk metrics, such as the CDCs Community Levels, were developed to predict the impact of COVID-19 on the community-level healthcare system based on routine surveillance data. However, they had limited utility as they were not routinely updated based on accumulating data and were not directly linked to specific outcomes, such as surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations beyond local capacities. Regression models could resolve these limitations, but they have limited interpretability and do not convey the reasoning behind their predictions. In this paper, we evaluated decision tree classifiers that were developed in "real-time" to predict surges in local hospitalizations due to COVID-19 between July 2020 and November 2022. These classifiers would have provided visually intuitive and interpretable decision rules for local decision-makers to understand and act upon, and by being updated weekly, would have responded to changes in the epidemic. We showed that these classifiers exhibit reasonable predictive ability with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auROC) > 80%. These classifiers maintained their performance temporally (i.e, over the duration of the pandemic) and spatially (i.e., across US counties). We also showed that these classifiers outperformed the CDCs Community Levels for predicting high hospital occupancy. Significance StatementA major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic was the risk of exceeding local healthcare capacity due to COVID-19-related hospitalizations. To assess this risk and inform mitigating strategies, several risk assessment tools were developed during the pandemic. Many of these tools, however, did not predict local outcomes, were not updated as the pandemic progressed, and/or were not interpretable by decision-makers. We propose an adaptive framework of decision tree classifiers to predict whether COVID-19-related hospital occupancy would exceed a given capacity threshold. This framework would provide interpretable classification rules to predict surges in local hospitalizations,and maintained its performance over time and across US counties, and outperformed the CDCs Community Level tool.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing the Implementation of Clinical Predictive Models to Minimize National Costs: A Sepsis Case Study 95%
- Optimal policy determination in sequential systemic and locoregional therapy of oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas: A patient-physician digital twin dyad with deep Q-learning for treatment selection 93%
- Are we there yet? An adaptive SIR model for continuous estimation of COVID-19 infection rate and reproduction number in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 94%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 94%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 95%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.