Back

A cross-sectional survey of General Practitioners' knowledge of the wait times for mental health treatment and services for adolescent patients with depression and anxiety in Australia.

O'Dea, B.; Subotic-Kerry, M.; Borchard, T.; Parker, B.; Vilus, B.; Iorfino, F.; Whitton, A. E.; Harris-Roxas, B.; Wade, T. D.; de Valle, M. K.; Glozier, N.; Nicholas, J.; Torok, M.; Braund, T. A.; Batterham, P. J.

2024-12-23 primary care research
10.1101/2024.09.12.24312088 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) play a key role in referring adolescents with depression and/or anxiety to mental health specialists and services, but their capacity to do so may be compromised by service wait times. It is unclear how GPs manage the mental healthcare of adolescents when the choice of treatment is not available. This study aimed to explore GPs self-reported referral practices to mental health specialists and services for adolescent depression and/or anxiety, as well as their perceived knowledge, acceptability, and impacts of the wait times for these. MethodsA cross-sectional online survey of 192 GPs in Australia who self-identified as treating adolescents (12 to 17 years old) with depression and/or anxiety. ResultsGPs most frequently referred adolescents with depression and/or anxiety to psychologists. However, the mean estimated wait time for psychologists was 57.26 days (SD: 47.91, Mdn: 45.0, range: 5-365), which was four times the proposed acceptable wait time (M: 14.66 days, SD: 8.70). Nearly all GPs (81.8%) had increased their level of care for adolescents due to long waits but had limited training in and knowledge of strategies for effective self-management. ConclusionsGPs in Australia lack information on the wait times for adolescent mental health specialists and services, despite frequent referrals. Greater knowledge of wait times, training in wait time approaches, and self-directed digital interventions may help to enhance the quality of primary care provided to adolescents.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
18
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%