Enhancing Dietary Supplement Question Answer via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with LLM
Hou, Y.; Zhang, R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo enhance the accuracy and reliability of dietary supplement (DS) question answering by integrating a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) LLM system with an updated and integrated DS knowledge base and providing a user-friendly interface. With. Materials and MethodsWe developed iDISK2.0 by integrating updated data from multiple trusted sources, including NMCD, MSKCC, DSLD, and NHPD, and applied advanced integration strategies to reduce noise. We then applied the iDISK2.0 with a RAG system, leveraging the strengths of large language models (LLMs) and a biomedical knowledge graph (BKG) to address the hallucination issues inherent in standalone LLMs. The system enhances answer generation by using LLMs (GPT-4.0) to retrieve contextually relevant subgraphs from the BKG based on identified entities in the query. A user-friendly interface was built to facilitate easy access to DS knowledge through conversational text inputs. ResultsThe iDISK2.0 encompasses 174,317 entities across seven types, six types of relationships, and 471,063 attributes. The iDISK2.0-RAG system significantly improved the accuracy of DS-related information retrieval. Our evaluations showed that the system achieved over 95% accuracy in answering True/False and multiple-choice questions, outperforming standalone LLMs. Additionally, the user-friendly interface enabled efficient interaction, allowing users to input free-form text queries and receive accurate, contextually relevant responses. The integration process minimized data noise and ensured the most up-to-date and comprehensive DS information was available to users. ConclusionThe integration of iDISK2.0 with an RAG system effectively addresses the limitations of LLMs, providing a robust solution for accurate DS information retrieval. This study underscores the importance of combining structured knowledge graphs with advanced language models to enhance the precision and reliability of information retrieval systems, ultimately supporting better-informed decisions in DS-related research and healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Concept Embedding for Feature Engineering in Phenotyping 96%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 95%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 94%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.