A survey of Large Language Model use in a hospital, research, and teaching campus
Gasparini, L.; Phillipson, N.; Capurro, D.; Rosenberg, R.; Buttery, J.; Howley, J.; Ranganathan, S.; Quinlan, C.; Selvadurai, N.; Wildenauer, M.; South, M.; Dimaguila, G. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has exploded since November 2022 but there is sparse evidence regarding LLM use in health, medical and research contexts. ObjectiveTo summarise the current uses of and attitudes towards LLMs across the clinical, research and teaching contexts in our campus. DesignWe administered a survey about LLM uses and attitudes. We conducted summary quantitative analysis and inductive qualitative analysis of free text responses. SettingIn August-September 2023, we circulated the survey amongst all staff and students across our campus (approximately n=7500), a fully integrated paediatric academic hospital and research institute. ParticipantsWe received 281 anonymous survey responses. Main outcome measuresWe asked about participants knowledge of LLMs, their current use of LLMs in professional or learning contexts, and perspectives on possible future uses, opportunities, and risks of LLM use. ResultsOver 90% of respondents have heard of LLM tools and about two-thirds have used them in their work on our campus. Respondents reported using LLMs for a range of uses, including for generating or editing text and exploring ideas. Many, but not necessarily all, respondents seem aware of the limitations and potential risks of LLMs, including privacy and security risks. Various respondents expressed enthusiasm about opportunities of LLM use, including increased efficiency. ConclusionsOur findings show LLM tools are already widely used on our campus. Guidelines and governance are needed to keep up with practice. We have developed recommendations for the use of LLMs on our campus using insights from this survey. What is knownThe known: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has increased rapidly since the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022. The new: Most survey respondents are aware of, if not using, LLMs in their work across our hospital, research, and university campus. Diverse uses were reported, including generating or editing text and exploring ideas. There were varying attitudes towards LLMs. Perceived risks included privacy and security risks. A key perceived opportunity was increased efficiency. The implications: LLM tools are already widely used on our campus, highlighting the need for guidelines and governance to keep up with practice.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning for Paediatric Related Decision Support in Emergency Care - A UK and Ireland Network Survey Study 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 93%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 93%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 96%
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 94%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An electronic application to improve management of infections in low-income neonatal units: pilot implementation of the NeoTree Beta App in a public sector hospital in Zimbabwe. 93%
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.