Development and evaluation of codelists for identifying marginalised groups in primary care
Perchyk, T.; de Vere Hunt, I.; Nicholson, B. D.; Mounce, L.; Sykes, K.; Lyratzopoulos, Y.; Lemanska, A.; Whitaker, K. L.; Kerrison, R. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrimary care electronic health records provide a rich source of information for inequalities research. However, the reliability and validity of the research derived from these records depends on the completeness and resolution of the codelists used to identify marginalised populations. AimThe aim of this project was to develop comprehensive codelists for identifying ethnic minorities, people with learning disabilities (LD), people with severe mental illness (SMI) and people who are transgender. Design and settingThis study was a codelist development project, conducted using primary care data from the United Kingdom. MethodGroups of interest were defined a priori. Relevant clinical codes were identified by searching Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) publications, codelist repositories and the CPRD code browser. Relevant codelists were downloaded and merged according to marginalised group. Duplicates were removed and remaining codes reviewed by two general practitioners. Comprehensiveness was assessed in a representative CPRD population of 10,966,759 people, by comparing the frequencies of individuals identified when using the curated codelists, compared to commonly used alternatives. ResultsA total of 52 codelists were identified. 1,420 unique codes were selected after removal of duplicates and GP review. Compared with comparator codelists, an additional 48,017 (76.6%), 52,953 (68.9%) and 508 (36.9%) people with a LD, SMI or transgender code were identified. The frequencies identified for ethnicity were consistent with expectations for the UK population. ConclusionThe codelists curated through this project will improve inequalities research by improving standards of identifying marginalised groups in primary care data. HOW THIS FITS INO_LIThe reliability and validity of primary care data for inequalities research depends on the comprehensiveness of the codes used to identify people from marginalised groups. C_LIO_LIThis study set out to develop comprehensive codelists for the identification of four key groups, known to experience health inequalities. C_LIO_LIWe developed comprehensive codelists for identifying ethnic minorities, learning disabilities, severe mental illness and people who are transgender, using a systematic approach. C_LIO_LIThe codelists were validated by two general practitioners, assessed in a representative sample, and can now be used in primary care practice and research, both nationally and internationally. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 93%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 96%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
- Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: A data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- Association between physical multimorbidity and common mental health disorders in rural and urban Malawian settings: preliminary findings from Healthy Lives Malawi long-term conditions survey 93%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 92%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.