Inter-strain variation in intra-chromosomal rates of recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans
Matharage, D. U.; Cutler, R.; Khadgi, A.; Dapper, A. L.
Show abstract
Meiotic recombination results in the exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes. One consequence of meiotic recombination is the production of novel combination of alleles. Recombination rate varies dramatically within and between species, populations, sexes and individuals. Although, the role of PRDM9 in intra-chromosomal variation in crossovers is extensively studied, variation in recombination rate and the cellular and evolutionary dynamics that influence recombination is not well understood due to the complexity of the recombination landscape, intrinsic variation in recombination, and the limited experimental approaches. Though, there has only been limited research regarding the variation in recombination rates in Caenorhabditis elegans, observations from previous studies bring out the potential of C. elegans to be a convenient system for studying intra-chromosomal variation in recombination rate that avoid many of the common pitfalls. Therefore, we investigated the variation in intra-chromosomal patterns of recombination rates in two distinct populations of C. elegans in one of the two high recombination regions of chromosome IV. We used phenotypic fluorescent markers which are inserted in chromosome IV to estimate the recombination rate of the two most genetically distinct strains, N2 and CB4856. We identified statistically significant differences in recombination rate between the two strains, with a 3% higher frequency of recombinant offspring in CB4856 in this focal region. Additionally, we did not find any evidence of sex differences in recombination rate (heterochiasmy). Moreover, we looked at the plasticity of recombination rate in response to stressful conditions in the two C. elegans strains. Here we observed a significant decrease in the recombination rate in both strains when exposed to stressful conditions. These results open the door to using C. elegans to study evolution and genetics of variation in recombination rate.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of essential genes in Caenorhabditis elegans through whole genome sequencing of legacy mutant collections 95%
- Natural variation in fertility is correlated with species-wide levels of divergence in Caenorhabditis elegans 94%
- Conditional immobilization for live imaging C. elegans using auxin-dependent protein depletion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing a candidate meiotic drive locus identified by pool sequencing 94%
- Precise Lineage Tracking Using Molecular Barcodes Demonstrates Fitness Trade-offs for Ivermectin Resistance in Nematodes 93%
- A deficiency screen of the 3rd chromosome for dominant modifiers of the Drosophila ER integral membrane protein, Jagunal 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Engineering the C. elegans genome with a nested, self-excising selection cassette 95%
- phiC31 integrase for recombination mediated single copy insertion and genome manipulation in C. elegans 94%
- Neuronal KGB-1 JNK MAPK signaling regulates the dauer developmental decision in response to environmental stress in C. elegans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- C. elegans dauer recovery varies with worm-bacteria interactions 94%
- Evolution of assortative mating following selective introgression of pigmentation genes between two Drosophila species 92%
- Evidence of capacitation in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis and its potential role in sex allocation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes 96%
- Functionally non-redundant paralogs spe-47 and spe-50 encode FB-MO associated proteins and interact with him-8 93%
- Nutrient sensing pathways regulating adult reproductive diapause in C. elegans 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.