Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol
Barhouche, R.; Tse, S.; Inglis, F.; Chaves, D.; Allison, E.; Colaco, T.; Morton Ninomiya, M.
Show abstract
The practice of putting research into action is known by various names, depending on disciplinary norms. Knowledge mobilization, translation, and transfer (collectively referred to as K*) are three common terminologies used in research literature. Knowledge-to-action opportunities and gaps in academic research often remain obscure to non-academic researchers in communities, policy and decision makers, and practitioners who could benefit from up-to-date information on health and wellbeing. Academic research training, funding, and performance metrics rarely prioritize or address non-academic community needs from research. We propose to conduct a scoping review on reported K* in community-driven research contexts, examining the governance, processes, methods, and benefits of K*, and mapping who, what, where, and when K* terminology is used. This protocol paper outlines our approach to gathering, screening, analyzing, and reporting on available published literature from four databases.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 96%
- Nurturing care practices for children with developmental disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Accessing Contraceptive Services among Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 96%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 95%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 93%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.