Medical Risk Classification For Severe COVID-19 Based On Chronic Medical Conditions: A Comparative Analysis
Westerhof, I.; Boer, A. d.; Lupattelli, A.; Slurink, I.; Boldea, O.; Nordeng, H. M. E.; Bosdriesz, J.; Pijpers, F.; Schim van der Loeff, M. F.; Knol, M.; van de Wijgert, J. H.; Bruijning-Verhagen, P.; Rozhnova, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control lists medical conditions conferring high- or moderate-risk for severe COVID-19. Individual European countries also developed risk classifications to guide COVID-19 vaccination recommendations. ObjectivesTo examine discordance between national and European risk classifications for severe COVID-19 in the Netherlands and Norway across general, hospitalized, and deceased populations, and investigate related factors. MethodsThis multi-country data-linkage study included 17.4 million inhabitants in the Netherlands and 5.6 million in Norway in 2020. Medical conditions were defined using ICD-10 codes in the European and Dutch classifications, and ICD-10 and ICPC-2 codes in the Norwegian classification. Individuals were classified as high-, moderate-, or low-risk per each classification. Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), Brier score, and area under the curve (AUC). ResultsDiscordance between classifications was 12-14% in the general population and 36-47% among hospitalized or deceased individuals. The European classification assigned more individuals to high-risk, while national classifications assigned more as moderate-risk. National classifications demonstrated higher sensitivity, particularly in Norway, while the European classification showed higher specificity. PPVs were [≤]0.9% and NPVs near 100% across all classifications. Norways national classification had better discrimination and calibration, while in the Netherlands, the European classification better predicted mortality. Discordances frequently involved subjects with cardiovascular disease, lung disease, and diabetes. ConclusionThe European classification defines a substantially broader high-risk population compared to national classifications. No single classification is universally optimal. Further research should refine which chronic conditions best predict severe COVID-19. FundingZonMw, EU, FCT, Norwegian Research Councils COVID-19 Emergency Call, iAPOGEE.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden and prevalence of prognostic factors for severe covid-19 disease in Sweden 93%
- COVID-19 vaccination and short-term mortality risk: a nationwide self-controlled case series study in The Netherlands 92%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic inequalities and diabetes complications: An analysis of administrative data from Hungary 92%
- Mortality Disparity By Socioeconomic Position In People With And Without Diabetes: Open Cohort Studies In Four High-Income Countries 91%
- Large differences in community COVID-19 testing across geographic areas in a Swedish region with 385,000 inhabitants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends in social contacts of individuals according to comorbidity and vaccination status, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study 92%
- Parental Income Gradients in Adult Health: A National Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of COVID-19 on long-term health and health care use 95%
- Burden of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and Implications for Healthcare Service Planning: A Population-based Cohort Study 94%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation in children and adolescents in Norway: A nationwide population-based study. 94%
- Lockdown and non-COVID-19 deaths: Cause-specific mortality during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic in Norway. A population-based register study 94%
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.