Back

Left Atrial Strain as a Predictor of Cardiac Dysfunction in a Murine Model of Pressure Overload

Salvas, J. P.; Moore-Morris, T.; Goergen, C. J.; Sicard, P.

2024-09-10 physiology
10.1101/2024.09.05.611376 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimLeft atrial (LA) strain is emerging as a valuable metric for evaluating cardiac function, particularly under pathological conditions such as pressure overload. This preclinical study investigates the predictive utility of LA strain on cardiac function in a murine model subjected to pressure overload, mimicking pathologies such as hypertension and aortic stenosis. MethodsHigh resolution ultrasound was performed in a cohort of mice (n=16) to evaluate left atrial and left ventricular function at baseline and 2- and 4-weeks after transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Acute adaptations in cardiac function were assessed in a subgroup of mice (n=10) with 3-days post TAC imaging. ResultsWe report an increase in LA max volume from 11.0 {+/-} 4.3{micro}L at baseline to 26.7 {+/-} 16.7{micro}L at 4 weeks (p=0.002) and a decrease in LA strain from 19.6 {+/-} 4.8% at baseline to 10.1 {+/-} 6.3% at 4 weeks (p=0.006). In the acute phase, LA strain dysfunction was present at 3-days (p<0.001) prior to alterations in LA volume (p=0.856) or left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (p=0.120). LA strain correlated with key indicators of cardiac performance including left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (r=0.563, p<0.001), longitudinal strain (r=-0.643, p<0.001) and strain rate (r=0.387, p=0.007). Furthermore, markers of atrial structure and function including LA max volume (AUC=0.858, p<0.001), ejection fraction (AUC=0.901 p<0.001), and strain (AUC=0.878, p<0.001) all predicted LV dysfunction. ConclusionLA strain and function assessments provide a reliable, non-invasive method for early detection and prediction of cardiac dysfunction in a model of pressure overload.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
7
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
10
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
11
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
12
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%