Back

MaskMol: Knowledge-guided Molecular Image Pre-Training Framework for Activity Cliffs with Pixel Masking

cheng, Z.; Xiang, H.; Ma, P.; Li, Z.; Jin, X.; Yang, X.; Lin, J.; Song, B.; Deng, Y.; Feng, X.; Deng, C.; Zeng, X.

2024-09-09 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.09.04.611324 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Activity cliffs, which refer to pairs of molecules that are structurally similar but show significant differences in their potency, can lead to model representation collapse and make the model challenging to distinguish them. Our research indicates that as molecular similarity increases, graph-based methods struggle to capture these nuances, whereas imagebased approaches effectively retain the distinctions. Thus, we developed MaskMol, a knowledge-guided molecular image selfsupervised learning framework. MaskMol accurately learns the representation of molecular images by considering multiple levels of molecular knowledge, such as atoms, bonds, and substructures. By utilizing pixel masking tasks, MaskMol extracts fine-grained information from molecular images, overcoming the limitations of existing deep learning models in identifying subtle structural changes. Experimental results demonstrate MaskMols high accuracy and transferability in activity cliff estimation and compound potency prediction across 20 different macromolecular targets, outperforming 25 state-of-the-art deep learning and machine learning approaches. Visualization analyses reveal MaskMols high biological interpretability in identifying activity cliff-relevant molecular substructures. Notably, through MaskMol, we identified candidate EP4 inhibitors that could be used to treat tumors. This study not only raises awareness about activity cliffs but also introduces a novel method for molecular image representation learning and virtual screening, advancing drug discovery and providing new insights into structure-activity relationships (SAR). Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixiangCheng/MaskMol.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.