Back

Copper resistance in Legionella pneumophila: role of genetic factors and host cells.

Cameron, G.; Faucher, S. P.

2024-09-04 microbiology
10.1101/2024.09.04.611240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Copper is frequently found in drinking water due to its presence in the natural environment and the widespread usage of copper pipes. This toxic metal has a well-known antimicrobial activity, an activity harnessed in copper-silver ionization (CSI) to eliminate the opportunistic pathogen Legionella pneumophila from engineered water systems. Despite utilizing the antimicrobial properties of copper in Legionella control, little is known about how copper containing environments affect L. pneumophila populations. The goal of this study is to understand how L. pneumophila responds to copper within a hot water distribution system (HWDS) environment. To answer this question, different sequence types and regulatory mutants were exposed to copper to compare their survival. L. pneumophila isolates of 4 sequence types from 3 different HWDSs exhibited a wide diversity of phenotypes after copper stress. The {Delta}letA and {Delta}letS mutants were sensitive to copper, indicating that the LetAS two component system is important for copper resistance. Additionaly, transmissive phase cultures were more resistant to copper than replicative phase cultures. Therefore, the regulation of entry into transmissive phase by the LetAS system is essential for L. pneumophilas ability to survive copper stress. In a water system, L. pneumophila replicates within eukaryotic hosts. When cocultured with the host ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis, L. pneumophila was more resistant to copper than when the bacteria were in a monoculture. No difference in L. pneumophila replication inside of hosts in cocultures with or without copper was observed. This result confirms that the presence of host cells protects L. pneumophila from copper stress. Therefore, presence of host cells in water system may limit the efficacy of copper-based control strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.0%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
11.0%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
4
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
6
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
12
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Molecular Microbiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
16
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
19
Microbiological Research
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Infection and Immunity
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%