Right Caudate Volume and Executive Functions in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Hai, T.; Swansburg, R.; Kahl, C. K.; Mrazik, M.; Lemay, J. F.; MacMaster, F. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe caudate and putamen have previously been implicated in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, previous studies have not investigated the relationship between the caudate and putamen with executive function (EF). The current study investigated the clinical relevance of the caudate and putamen with respect to EF. MethodWe studied 49 children (24 ADHD/25 typically developing children (TDC)). All participants in the ADHD group had to undergo a 48-hour stimulant medication washout period. Participants completed cognitive tasks related to working memory/inhibition and underwent a T1-weighted MRI sequence. All parents completed behaviour rating scales using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance, Pearson correlations, and linear regressions. ResultsChildren with ADHD demonstrated a higher frequency of perseverative errors compared to TDC (p <.05), and their parents reported significantly more EF challenges (p <.001). No difference was observed in the working memory tasks. No significant volumetric differences were seen in the caudate or the putamen. A linear regression model suggested that the right caudate volume accounted for 10.3% of the variance in emotion regulation as reported by parents on the BRIEF-2 in the overall sample. DiscussionWe observed significant EF challenges without volumetric differences. However, the right caudate was correlated to parent ratings of emotional regulation, highlighting the need to consider emotional regulation difficulties in ADHD.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Special Issue: Demographic and Mental Health Assessments in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study: Updates and Longitudinal Trajectories 92%
- Negative Impact of Daily Screen Use on Inhibitory Control Network in Preadolescence: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study 92%
- Academic Success and Mental Health: The Paradox of Frontoparietal-Default Mode Network Coupling among Children Facing Poverty 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence and developmental course of auditory processing differences in autistic children 94%
- Individuals with autism have no detectable deficit in neural markers of prediction error when presented with auditory rhythms of varied temporal complexity 92%
- Dissecting the heterogeneous subcortical brain volume of Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using community detection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural Brain Alterations and Their Association with Cognitive Function and Symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Families 95%
- Linking alpha oscillations, attention and inhibitory control in adult ADHD with EEG neurofeedback 93%
- Reward Responsiveness across Autism and Autistic Traits – Evidence from Neuronal, Autonomic, and Behavioural Levels 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinctive neural correlates of phonological processing and reading impairment in fetal alcohol-exposed adolescents with and without facial dysmorphology 94%
- White matter connectivity in uncinate fasciculus accounts for visual attention span in developmental dyslexia 90%
- Low-level, prediction-based sensory and motor processesare unimpaired in Autism 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter connectivity of uncinate fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus: A possible early biomarker for callous-unemotional behaviors in young children with ADHD 96%
- Transdiagnostic Profiles of Behaviour and Communication Relate to Academic and Socio-emotional Functioning and Neural White Matter Organisation 92%
- Characterizing neuroanatomic heterogeneity in people with and without ADHD based on subcortical brain volumes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.