Brief remote psychological treatments for healthcare workers with emotional distress during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial
Salum, G. A.; Costa, M. d. A.; Spanemberg, L.; Simioni, A. R.; Gosmann, N. P.; de Souza, L. H.; Cuijpers, P.; Pine, D. S.; Brunoni, A. R.; Kristensen, C. H.; Fleck, M. P. d. A.; Manfro, G. G.; Dreher, C. B.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has catalyzed a widespread mental health crisis, impacting millions of people. This study aimed to compare three brief remote psychological treatments for healthcare workers with emotional distress during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODSNationwide three-arm randomized clinical trial in Brazil. This is a transdiagnostic study that included professionals and students from health services with high levels of anxiety, depression, or irritability symptoms, as defined by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The exclusion criterion was positive suicide risk. Participants were randomized single session psychoeducation group plus weekly personalized pre-recorded videos for four weeks (SSI-ET), brief cognitive behavioral telepsychotherapy group (B-CBT, four sessions), or brief interpersonal telepsychotherapy (B-IPT, four sessions). This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04635618). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in T-scores in PROMIS rating scales of anxiety, depression, and/or irritability at one-month. FINDINGSOf the 3328 volunteers assessed for eligibility, 999 participants were enrolled, from May 19th 2020 to December 31st 2021, and allocated to SSI-ET (n=342), B-CBT (n=323), or B-IPT (n=334). All three groups showed significant symptom reductions in the one-month assessment that were maintained over the three and six-month follow-ups (Cohens d range = 0.94-1.36, p<0.001), with no significant difference between groups. The estimated proportion of responders were 46.5%, 43.7% and 44.6% for SSI-ET, B-CBT and B-IPT, respectively. ConclusionsOur results refute the hypothesis that therapeutic interventions with higher number of sessions and with more specialized therapeutic components offer advantages in alleviating emotional distress, particularly among healthcare workers facing epidemic emergencies. These results have critical implications for planning interventions for crisis responses, especially in settings with limited resources. FUNDINGMinistry of Health of Brazil, Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, and Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa/Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 96%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 94%
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 94%
- Screening for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder following Childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 95%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists’ competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial 97%
- Individual participant data systematic reviews with meta-analyses of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A protocol 96%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 94%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.