Back

Automated Phonological Error Scoring for Children with Language and Hearing Impairment

Sundstrom, S.; Themistocleous, C.

2024-09-04 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.04.24313011 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePhonological production impairments are prevalent in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and hearing impairment (HI). This study aims to quantify and compare phonological errors in Swedish-speaking children using a novel automated assessment tool and provide an automatic machine learning classification algorithm of children with DLD and HI to age-matched controls based on phonological errors. Methods72 Swedish-speaking children (29 with DLD, 14 with HI, and 29 typically developing) participated. Phonological production was elicited using a 72-item confrontation naming task. A novel tool was developed to calculate a composite phonological error score and specific scores for different phonological errors (deletions, insertions, substitutions, and transpositions) from written speech productions. This tool leverages the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and a form of the Normalized Damerau-Levenshtein Distance for accurate error analysis. ResultsThe composite score successfully differentiated between children with DLD and typically developing children, highlighting its sensitivity in detecting phonological impairment. Machine learning models can accurately differentiate between children with and without language disorders. However, children with DLD and HI differed in the phonemic deletion errors, which suggests that their phonemic production is relatively similar. ConclusionsChildren with DLD and HI exhibit significantly higher phonological error rates compared to typically developing peers. Children with HI and DLC are comparably impaired in phonology (as manifested by the compositive phonological score). These findings highlight the potential of machine learning for early identification and targeted intervention in language disorders, improving outcomes for affected children and demonstrated the potential of a multilingual tool for scoring phonological errors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
4
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
15
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%