Back

Automated Phonological Error Scoring for Children with Language and Hearing Impairment

Sundstrom, S.; Themistocleous, C.

2024-09-04 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.04.24313011 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePhonological production impairments are prevalent in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and hearing impairment (HI). This study aims to quantify and compare phonological errors in Swedish-speaking children using a novel automated assessment tool and provide an automatic machine learning classification algorithm of children with DLD and HI to age-matched controls based on phonological errors. Methods72 Swedish-speaking children (29 with DLD, 14 with HI, and 29 typically developing) participated. Phonological production was elicited using a 72-item confrontation naming task. A novel tool was developed to calculate a composite phonological error score and specific scores for different phonological errors (deletions, insertions, substitutions, and transpositions) from written speech productions. This tool leverages the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and a form of the Normalized Damerau-Levenshtein Distance for accurate error analysis. ResultsThe composite score successfully differentiated between children with DLD and typically developing children, highlighting its sensitivity in detecting phonological impairment. Machine learning models can accurately differentiate between children with and without language disorders. However, children with DLD and HI differed in the phonemic deletion errors, which suggests that their phonemic production is relatively similar. ConclusionsChildren with DLD and HI exhibit significantly higher phonological error rates compared to typically developing peers. Children with HI and DLC are comparably impaired in phonology (as manifested by the compositive phonological score). These findings highlight the potential of machine learning for early identification and targeted intervention in language disorders, improving outcomes for affected children and demonstrated the potential of a multilingual tool for scoring phonological errors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.8%
3
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
5
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
6
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
7
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
21
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
28
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%