Automated Phonological Error Scoring for Children with Language and Hearing Impairment
Sundstrom, S.; Themistocleous, C.
Show abstract
PurposePhonological production impairments are prevalent in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and hearing impairment (HI). This study aims to quantify and compare phonological errors in Swedish-speaking children using a novel automated assessment tool and provide an automatic machine learning classification algorithm of children with DLD and HI to age-matched controls based on phonological errors. Methods72 Swedish-speaking children (29 with DLD, 14 with HI, and 29 typically developing) participated. Phonological production was elicited using a 72-item confrontation naming task. A novel tool was developed to calculate a composite phonological error score and specific scores for different phonological errors (deletions, insertions, substitutions, and transpositions) from written speech productions. This tool leverages the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and a form of the Normalized Damerau-Levenshtein Distance for accurate error analysis. ResultsThe composite score successfully differentiated between children with DLD and typically developing children, highlighting its sensitivity in detecting phonological impairment. Machine learning models can accurately differentiate between children with and without language disorders. However, children with DLD and HI differed in the phonemic deletion errors, which suggests that their phonemic production is relatively similar. ConclusionsChildren with DLD and HI exhibit significantly higher phonological error rates compared to typically developing peers. Children with HI and DLC are comparably impaired in phonology (as manifested by the compositive phonological score). These findings highlight the potential of machine learning for early identification and targeted intervention in language disorders, improving outcomes for affected children and demonstrated the potential of a multilingual tool for scoring phonological errors.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automating intended target identification for paraphasias in discourse using a large language model 94%
- Towards an individualised neural assessment of receptive language in children 93%
- Multidisciplinary assessment and interventions for childhood auditory processing disorder (APD) and listening difficulties (LiD) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual formant discrimination during speech movement planning 94%
- Motor and non-motor sequence prediction is equally affected in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder 93%
- Identifying Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Features for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Children using Machine Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening Difficulties in Children with Normal Audiograms: Relation to Hearing and Cognition 95%
- Communication under sharply degraded auditory input and the “2-sentence” problem 95%
- Adaptive hearing aid benefit in children with mild/moderate hearing loss: A registered, double-blind, randomized clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of speaker and listener sex on auditory attention decoding performance 94%
- From Modulated Noise to Natural Speech: the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Frequency Following Response 93%
- The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.