Back

Higher dose corticosteroids in hospitalised COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

Horby, P. W.; Emberson, J. R.; Thwaites, L.; Campbell, M.; Peto, L.; Pessoa-Amorim, G.; Staplin, N.; Hamers, R. L.; Amuasi, J.; Nel, J.; Kestelyn, E.; Phong, N. T.; Shrestha, A.; Nasronudin, N.; Sarkar, R.; Thach, P. N.; Patel, D.; Samardi, U.; Stewart, R.; Nelwan, E.; Rawal, M.; Baillie, J. K.; Buch, M. H.; Day, J. N.; Faust, S. N.; Jaki, T.; Jeffery, K.; Juszczak, E.; Knight, M.; Lim, W. S.; Mafham, M.; Montgomery, A.; Mumford, A.; Rowan, K.; Basnyat, B.; Haynes, R.; Landray, M. J.

2024-09-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.09.04.24312992 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLow-dose corticosteroids (e.g. 6 mg dexamethasone) have been shown to reduce mortality for hypoxic COVID-19 patients. We have previously reported that higher dose corticosteroids cause harm in patients with hypoxia but not receiving ventilatory support (non-invasive mechanical ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation), but the balance of efficacy and safety in patients receiving ventilatory support is uncertain. MethodsThis randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]) assessed multiple possible treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Eligible and consenting adult patients receiving ventilatory support were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual care with higher dose corticosteroids (dexamethasone 20 mg once daily for 5 days followed by 10 mg once daily for 5 days or until discharge if sooner) or usual standard of care alone (which includes dexamethasone 6 mg once daily for 10 days or until discharge if sooner). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalisation and (among participants not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline) the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation or death. Recruitment closed on 31 March 2024 when funding for the trial ended. The RECOVERY trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04381936). FindingsBetween 25 May 2021 and 9 January 2024, 477 COVID-19 patients receiving ventilatory support were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus higher dose corticosteroids versus usual care alone (of whom 99% received corticosteroids during the follow-up period). Of those randomised, 221 (46%) were in Asia, 245 (51%) in the UK and 11 (2%) in Africa. 143 (30%) had diabetes mellitus. Overall, 86 (35%) of 246 patients allocated to higher dose corticosteroids versus 86 (37%) of 231 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio [RR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.64-1.18; p=0.37). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (128 [52%] in the higher dose corticosteroids group vs 120 [52%] in the usual care group; RR 1.04, 0.81-1.33]; p=0.78). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (76 [37%] of 206 vs 93 [45%] of 205; RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.63-1.00]; p=0.05). InterpretationIn patients hospitalised for COVID-19 receiving ventilatory support, we found no evidence that higher dose corticosteroids reduced the risk of death compared to usual care, which included low dose corticosteroids. FundingUK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research (Grant ref: MC_PC_19056), and Wellcome Trust (Grant Ref: 222406/Z/20/Z).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
20
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%