Back

Self-driving development of perfusion processes for monoclonal antibody production

Mueller, C.; Vuillemin, T.; Gadiyar, C. J.; Souquet, J.; Bielser, J. M.; Fagnani, A.; Sokolov, M.; von Stosch, M.; Feidl, F.; Butte, A.; Cruz Bournazou, M. N.

2024-09-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.09.03.610922 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of autonomous agents in bioporcess development is crucial for advancing biopharma innovation, as it can significantly reduce the time and resources required to transition from product to process. While robotics and machine learning have greatly accelerated drug discovery and initial screening, the later stages of development have primarily benefited from experimental automation, lacking advanced computational tools for experimental planning and execution. For example, in the development of new monoclonal antibodies, the search for optimal upstream conditions (such as feeding strategy, pH, temperature, and media composition) is often conducted using sophisticated high-throughput (HT) mini-bioreactor systems, while the integration of machine learning tools for experimental design and operation in these systems have not matured accordingly. In this work, we introduce an integrated user-friendly software framework that combines a Bayesian experimental design algorithm, a cognitive digital twin of the cultivation system, and an advanced 24-parallel mini-bioreactor perfusion experimental setup. This results in an autonomous experimental machine capable of: (1) embedding existing process knowledge, (2) learning during experimentation, utilizing information from similar processes, (4) predicting future events, and (5) autonomously operating the parallel cultivation setup to achieve challenging objectives. As proof of concept, we present experimental results from 27-day-long cultivations operated by the autonomous software agent, which successfully achieved challenging goals such as increasing the viable cell volume (VCV) and maximizing the viability throughout the experiment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
IFAC-PapersOnLine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
10
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
12
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
20
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%