Back

Azithromycin Treatment Response as a Probe to Attribute Bacterial Aetiologies of Diarrhoea using Molecular Diagnostics: A Reanalysis of the AntiBiotics for Children with severe Diarrhoea (ABCD) Trial

Cornick, J.; Elwood, S.; Platts-Mills, J. A.; Pavlinac, P.; Manji, K.; Sudfeld, C.; Duggan, C. P.; Dube, Q.; Bar-Zeev, N.; Kotloff, K.; Sow, S. O.; Sazawal, S.; Singa, B. O.; Walson, J. L.; Qamar, F.; Ahmed, T.; De Costa, A.; Rogawski McQuade, E. T.

2024-09-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.09.03.24312730 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMulti-pathogen molecular diagnostics enable assignment of diarrhoea aetiology, but defining thresholds of pathogen quantity to accurately attribute aetiology is challenging in high-burden settings where coinfections are common. The Antibiotics for Children with severe Diarrhoea (ABCD) trial provides an opportunity to leverage the azithromycin treatment response to inform which diarrhoea episodes are bacterial. MethodsWe analysed data from ABCD, which randomized children with watery diarrhoea to azithromycin or placebo. We quantified heterogeneity in the azithromycin treatment response by the quantity of enteric pathogens detected by qPCR as a tool for understanding aetiology. ResultsThe heterogeneity in azithromycin treatment response was most prominent for Shigella. The risk ratio for diarrhoea on day 3 post enrolment for azithromycin compared to placebo was 13% (95% CI:3, 23) lower per log10 increase in Shigella quantity. The protective effect of azithromycin on diarrhoea at day 3 also became stronger as pathogen quantities increased for Vibrio cholerae, ST-ETEC, and tEPEC. No association between pathogen quantity and azithromycin response was observed for Campylobacter, LT-ETEC or EAEC. The associations were consistent for the outcome of 90-day hospitalisation or death. ConclusionsThe relationships between response to azithromycin treatment and bacterial pathogen quantities observed for Shigella, Vibrio cholerae, ST-ETEC and tEPEC confirm prior evidence that these pathogens are the likely cause of diarrhoea when detected at high quantities. The lack of a similar response pattern for Campylobacter, LT-ETEC or EAEC is consistent with the limited association between pathogen quantity and diarrhoea symptoms previously observed in large studies of diarrhoea aetiology. Key message (3 succinct bullet points, each a single sentence)O_LIWe investigated whether heterogeneity in treatment response observed in the ABCD trial, where children with diarrhoea were randomised to receive azithromycin or placebo, could be used to inform aetiological attribution of diarrhoea to bacterial enteric pathogens. C_LIO_LIThe protective effect of azithromycin on diarrhoea at day 3 and hospitalisation or death at day 90 became stronger as pathogen quantities increased for Shigella, Vibrio cholerae, ST-ETEC and tEPEC but not for Campylobacter, LT-ETEC or EAEC. C_LIO_LIThe relationships between Shigella, Vibrio cholerae, ST-ETEC and tEPEC quantity and response to antibiotic treatment confirm prior evidence that these pathogens are the likely cause of diarrhoea when detected at high quantities and could be used to inform which diarrhoea cases should be treated with antibiotics. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
4
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%