Back

Associations Between Blood Markers of the GSH Redox cycle and Brain White Matter Microstructure in Psychosis

Pavan, T.; Steullet, P.; Aleman-Gomez, Y.; Jenni, R.; Schilliger, Z.; Cleusix, M.; Alameda, L.; Do, K. Q.; Conus, P.; Hagmann, P.; Dwir, D.; Klauser, P.; Jelescu, I.

2024-09-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.09.02.24312940 medRxiv
Show abstract

In groups of patients suffering from schizophrenia (SZ), redox dysregulation was reported in both peripheral fluids and brain. It has been hypothesized that such dysregulation, including alterations of the glutathione (GSH) cycle could participate in the brain white matter (WM) abnormalities in SZ due to the oligodendrocytes susceptibility to oxidative stress. In this study we aim to assess the differences between 82 schizophrenia patients (PT) and 86 healthy controls (HC) in GSH-redox peripheral blood markers: GSH peroxidase (GPx), reductase (GR) enzymatic activities and their ratio (GPx/GR-ratio), evaluating the hypotheses that alterations in the homeostasis of the systemic GSH cycle may be associated with pathological mechanisms in the brain WM in PT. To do so, we employ the advanced diffusion MRI methods: Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) and White Matter Tract Integrity-Watson (WMTI-W), which provide excellent sensitivity to demyelination and neuroinflammation. We show that GPx levels are higher (p=0.00041) in female control participants and decrease with aging (p=0.026). We find differences between PT and HC in the association of GR and mean kurtosis (MK, p<0.0001). Namely, lower MK was associated with higher blood GR activity in HC, but not in PT, suggesting that high GR activity (a hallmark of reductive stress) in HC was linked to changes in myelin integrity. However, GSH-redox peripheral blood markers did not explain the WM anomalies detected in PT, or the design of the present study could not detect subtle phenomenon, if present.

Published in NeuroImage: Clinical (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.