Back

Black Women's Lived Experiences of Depression and Related Barriers and Facilitators to Utilising Healthcare Services: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Co-produced with Experts by Lived Experiences

Jieman, A.-T.; Soliman, F.; York, K.; Bhui, K.; Onwumere, J.; Wynter, S.; Amasowomwan, F.; Johnson, S.; Jones, J. M.

2024-09-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.09.02.24311928 medRxiv
Show abstract

Depression among Black women is a significant public health concern. However, our understanding of their unique experiences and the barriers and facilitators to utilising healthcare services remains limited. To address these issues, we conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis in collaboration with experts by lived experiences. We searched seven databases (ASSIA, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, CINAHL, AMED and EMBASE) from inception to 9th September 2021 and updated to 29th March 2024 with an English language restriction. Study quality and confidence in findings were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Of 15025 papers screened, 45 were eligible for inclusion. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Women reported depression stemming from racial and gender-related stressors, social isolation, and a loss of faith; moreover, the Strong Black Woman schema masked depression symptoms. Mistrust of healthcare providers, stigma, religious coping, and pressure to conform to the Strong Black Woman schema hindered healthcare service utilisation. The rapport between women and their healthcare providers, endorsement from faith leaders, and points of crisis enabled service utilisation. Lived experience experts provided reflections and recommendations for practice. HighlightsO_LIRecognition of depression may be hampered by schemas connected to Black womens identity. C_LIO_LITrust between Black women experiencing depression and clinicians is essential for effective care. C_LIO_LITraining which incorporates antiracist principles is needed for competence in discussing issues surrounding race and gender. C_LIO_LI(Re-)consideration of diagnostic criteria to acknowledge differential presentation and the development of culturally adapted treatments are warranted. C_LIO_LICo-producing research with experts by lived experience ensures it is more impactful. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
4
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
7
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%