Back

In vivo Imaging and Pharmacokinetics of Percutaneously Injected Ultrasound and X-ray Imageable Thermosensitive Hydrogel loaded with Doxorubicin versus Free Drug in Swine

Delgado, J. F.; Negussie, A. H.; Varble, N. A.; Mikhail, A. S.; Arrichiello, A.; Borde, T.; Saccenti, L.; Bakhutashvili, I.; Morhard, R.; Owen, J. W.; Karanian, J. W.; Pritchard, W. F.; Wood, B. J.

2024-09-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.09.01.610710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intratumoral injections often lack visibility, leading to unpredictable outcomes such as incomplete tumor coverage, off-target drug delivery and systemic toxicities. This study investigated an ultrasound (US) and x-ray imageable thermosensitive hydrogel based on poloxamer 407 (POL) percutaneously delivered in a healthy swine model. The primary objective was to assess the 2D and 3D distribution of the hydrogel within tissue across three different needle devices and injection sites: liver, kidney, and intercostal muscle region. Secondly, pharmacokinetics of POL loaded with doxorubicin (POLDOX) were evaluated and compared to free doxorubicin injection (DOXSoln) with a Single End Hole Needle. Utilizing 2D and 3D morphometrics from US and x-ray imaging techniques such as Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone Beam CT (CBCT), we monitored the localization and leakage of POLDOX over time. Relative iodine concentrations measured with CBCT following incorporation of an iodinated contrast agent in POL indicated potential drug diffusion and advection transport. Furthermore, US imaging revealed temporal changes, suggesting variations in acoustic intensity, heterogeneity, and echotextures. Notably, 3D reconstruction of the distribution of POL and POLDOX from 2D ultrasound frames was achieved and morphometric data obtained. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed lower systemic exposure of the drug in various organs with POLDOX formulation compared to DOXSoln formulation. This was demonstrated by a lower area under the curve (852.1 {+/-} 409.1 ng/mL{middle dot}h vs 2283.4 {+/-} 377.2 ng/mL{middle dot}h) in the plasma profile, suggesting a potential reduction in systemic toxicity. Overall, the use of POL formulation offers a promising strategy for precise and localized drug delivery, that may minimize adverse effects. Dual modality POL imaging enabled analysis of patterns of gel distribution and morphology, alongside of pharmacokinetics of local delivery. Incorporating hydrogels into drug delivery systems holds significant promise for improving the predictability of the delivered drug and enhancing spatial conformability. These advancements can potentially enhance the safety and precision of anticancer therapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
25
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%