Developing an evaluation framework for public health environmental surveillance: Protocol for an international, multidisciplinary e-Delphi study
Manuel, D. G.; Bennett, C.; Brown, E.; Buckeridge, D. L.; Freedhoff, Y.; Funnell, S.; Ishtiaq, F.; Wade, M. J.; Moher, D.; the PHES-EF Executive Group,
Show abstract
IntroductionPublic health environmental surveillance has evolved, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic, with wastewater-based surveillance being a prominent example. As surveillance methods diversify and expand, it is essential to have a robust evaluation of surveillance systems. This electronic Delphi study will propose an evaluation framework for public health environmental surveillance, informed by the expanding practice of wastewater-based surveillance during the pandemic. MethodsThe Public Health Environmental Surveillance Evaluation Framework (PHES-EF) will be developed in five steps. In Step 1, a multinational and multidisciplinary executive group will be formed to guide the framework development process. In Step 2, candidate items for Round 1 of the electronic Delphi will be generated by conducting relevant scoping reviews and consultation with the study executive group. In Step 3, an international electronic Delphi will be conducted over two rounds to develop consensus on items for the framework. In Step 4, the executive group will reconvene to finalize the evaluation framework, discuss standout items, and determine the dissemination strategies. Lastly, Step 5 will focus on disseminating the evaluation framework to all parties involved with or affected by wastewater-based surveillance using traditional and public-oriented methods. DiscussionThe electronic Delphi study will provide multidisciplinary and multinational consensus for the evaluation framework for public health environmental surveillance by providing a set of minimum criteria required for their evaluation. The evaluation framework is intended to support the sustainability of environmental surveillance and improve its implementation, reliability, credibility, and value.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: a scoping review protocol 96%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation protocol for an instrument to measure women’s empowerment in urban sanitation across countries: The Agency, Resources, and Institutional Structures for Sanitation-related Empowerment (ARISE) Scales 94%
- Protocol for the PATHOME Study: A Cohort Study on Urban Societal Development and the Ecology of Enteric Disease Transmission among Infants, Domestic Animals, and the Environment 93%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- HIPTox – Hazard Identification Platform to Assess the Health Impacts from Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutant Exposures, through Mechanistic Toxicology: A single-centre double-blind human exposure trial protocol 93%
- Does WASH FIT improve water, sanitation, and hygiene and related health impacts in healthcare facilities? A systematic review 93%
- The Burden Of Poor Household Drinking-Water Quality On HIV/AIDS Infected Individuals In Rural Communities Of Ugu District Municipality, Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 95%
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 94%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-Based Sero-Epidemiological Study Protocol For The Impact Of Smoking On SARS-COV-2 Infection And COVID-19 Outcomes – The Troina Study 92%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.