Large Language Models in Cardiology: A Systematic Review
Gendler, M.; Nadkarni, G.; Sudri, K.; Cohen-Shelly, M.; Glicksberg, B.; Efros, O.; Soffer, S.; Klang, E.
Show abstract
PurposeThis review analyzes the application of large language models (LLMs), in the field of cardiology, with a focus on evaluating their performances across various clinical tasks. MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed for studies published up to April 14, 2024. Our search used a wide range of keywords related to LLMs and cardiology to capture various relevant terms. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. ResultsFifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, categorized into four domains: chronic and progressive cardiac conditions, acute cardiac events, cardiology education, and cardiac monitoring. Six studies addressing chronic conditions demonstrated variability in the accuracy and depth of LLM-generated responses. In acute cardiac scenarios, three articles showed that LLMs provided medical advice with mixed effectiveness, particularly in delivering CPR instructions. Two studies in educational cardiology revealed high accuracy in answering assessment questions and interpreting clinical cases. Finally, four articles on cardiac diagnostics showed that multimodal LLMs displayed a range of capabilities in ECGs interpretation, with some models performing at or exceeding the level of human specialists. ConclusionLLMs demonstrate considerable potential in the field of cardiology, particularly in educational applications and routine diagnostics. However, their performance remains inconsistent across various clinical scenarios, particularly in acute care settings where precision is critical. Enhancing their accuracy in interpreting real-world complex medical data and emergency response guidance is imperative before integration into clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiology Knowledge Assessment of Retrieval-Augmented Open versus Proprietary Large Language Models 95%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 94%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GenECG: A synthetic image-based ECG dataset to augment artificial intelligence-enhanced algorithm development 94%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 91%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Diagnostic Reports from Images of Electrocardiograms at the Point-of-Care 95%
- Multimodal deep learning enhances diagnostic precision in left ventricular hypertrophy 92%
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 94%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 92%
- How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.