Model uncertainty estimates for deep learning mammographic density prediction using ordinal and classification approaches
Squires, S.; Kuling, G.; Evans, D. G.; Martel, A. L.; Astley, S. M.
Show abstract
PurposeMammographic density is associated with the risk of developing breast cancer and can be predicted using deep learning methods. Model uncertainty estimates are not produced by standard regression approaches but would be valuable for clinical and research purposes. Our objective is to produce deep learning models with in-built uncertainty estimates without degrading predictive performance. ApproachWe analyse data from over 150,000 mammogram images with associated continuous density scores from expert readers in the Predicting Risk Of Cancer At Screening (PROCAS) study. We re-designate the continuous density scores to 100 density classes then train classification and ordinal deep learning models. Distributions and distribution-free methods are applied to extract predictions and uncertainties. A deep learning regression model is trained on the continuous density scores to act as a direct comparison. ResultsThe root mean squared error (RMSE) between expert assigned density labels and predictions of the standard regression model are 8.42 (8.34-8.51) while the RMSE for the classification and ordinal classification are 8.37 (8.28-8.46) and 8.44 (8.35-8.53) respectively. The average uncertainties produced by the models are higher when the density scores from pairs of expert readers density scores differ more, are higher when different mammogram views of the same views are more variable and when two separately trained models show higher variation. ConclusionsUsing either a classification or ordinal approach we can produce model uncertainty estimates without loss of predictive performance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Breast Ultrasound Segmentation through Fine-tuning and Optimization Techniques: Sharp Attention UNet 94%
- Detection and measurement of butterfly eyespot and spot patterns using convolutional neural networks 94%
- Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 94%
- An Assistive Computer Vision Tool to Automatically Detect Changes in Fish Behavior In Response to Ambient Odor 94%
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using random forests to uncover the predictive power of distance-varying cell interactions in tumor microenvironments 94%
- A Mathematical Model of Exploration and Exploitation in Natural Scene Viewing 94%
- Comparing a computational model of visual problem solving with human vision on a difficult vision task. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 95%
- Fiberscopic Pattern Removal for Optimal Coverage in 3D Bladder Reconstructions of Fiberscope Cystoscopy Videos 93%
- A 3D CNN Classification Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 using Computed Tomography Images 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.