Back

Systematic evaluation of de novo mutation calling tools using whole genome sequencing data

Shah, A.; Monger, S.; Troup, M.; Ip, E. K.; Giannoulatou, E.

2024-08-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.08.28.610208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

De novo mutations (DNMs) are genetic alterations that occur for the first time in an offspring. DNMs have been found to be a significant cause of severe developmental disorders. With the widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, accurate detection of DNMs is crucial. Several bioinformatics tools have been developed to call DNMs from NGS data, but no study to date has systematically compared these tools. We used both real whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from a trio from the 1000 Genomes Project (1000G) and an in-house simulated trio dataset to evaluate five DNM calling tools: DeNovoGear, TrioDeNovo, PhaseByTransmission, VarScan2, and DeNovoCNN. For DNMs called in the real dataset, we observed 8.4% concordance of variants between all tools, while 83.8% of DNMs variants were identified by only one caller. For simulated trio WGS dataset spiked with 100 DNMs, the concordance rate was also low at 3.9%. DeNovoGear achieved the highest F1 score on the real 1000G dataset, while DeNovoCNN had the highest F1 score on the simulated data. Our study provides valuable recommendations for the selection and application of DNM callers on WGS trio data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.