Back

Solving the SLoSS debate: Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity loss

de Jager, M.; Pos, E.

2024-08-28 ecology
10.1101/2024.08.27.609888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Should what is left of nature be contained in a Single Large or Several Small (SLoSS) areas? This question of what would minimize the impact severity of habitat destruction on biodiversity loss is much debated, mainly because studies generally focus on different spatial and temporal scales. Using a semi-spatially explicit, (near-)neutral, individual-based model, we investigate the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity loss at two spatial (landscape-versus subcommunity level) and two temporal scales (static versus dynamic effects). Our results show that the role of spatial configuration of habitat destruction depends on when and at what scale we measure biodiversity loss. When considering the more realistic assumption that species differ in dispersal capacity, differences between spatial configurations are likely to be amplified. Our results indicate that the spatial configuration of habitat loss needs to be considered when evaluating the risks of further habitat destruction.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
8
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%