Back

Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands

Mann, A. E.; Magnussen, E.; Tillquist, C. R.

2024-08-28 genetics
10.1101/2024.08.27.601563 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Faroe Islands are a small archipelago located in the North Atlantic likely colonized by a small group of founders sometime between 50 and 300 CE. Post colonization, the Faroese people have been largely isolated from admixture with mainland and other island populations in the region. As such, the initial founder effect and subsequent genetic drift are likely major contributors to the modern genetic diversity found among the Faroese. In this study, we assess the utility of Y-chromosomal microsatellites to detect founder effect in the Faroe Islands through the construction of haplotype networks and a novel empirical method, mutational distance from modal haplotype histograms (MDM), for the visualization and evaluation of population bottlenecks. We compared samples from the Faroe Islands and Iceland to possible regional source populations and documented a loss of diversity associated with founder events. Additionally, within-haplogroup diversity statistics reveals lower haplotype diversity and richness within both the Faroe Islands and Iceland, consistent with a small founder population colonizing both regions. However, in the within-haplogroup networks, the Faroe Islands are found within the larger set of potential source populations while Iceland is consistently found on isolated branches. Moreover, comparisons of within-haplogroup MDM histograms document a clear founder signal in the Faroes and Iceland, but the strength of this signal is haplogroup-dependent which may be indicative of more recent admixture or other demographic processes. The results of the current study and lack of conformity between Icelandic and Faroese haplotypes implies that the two populations were founded by different paternal gene pools and there is no detectable post-founder admixture between the two groups.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.0%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
6
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
22
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
24
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%