Back

Deep Learning-powered CT-less Multi-tracer Organ Segmentation from PET Images: A solution for unreliable CT segmentation in PET/CT Imaging

Salimi, Y.; Mansouri, Z.; Shiri, I.; Mainta, I.; Zaidi, H.

2024-08-28 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.08.27.24312482 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe common approach for organ segmentation in hybrid imaging relies on co-registered CT (CTAC) images. This method, however, presents several limitations in real clinical workflows where mismatch between PET and CT images are very common. Moreover, low-dose CTAC images have poor quality, thus challenging the segmentation task. Recent advances in CT-less PET imaging further highlight the necessity for an effective PET organ segmentation pipeline that does not rely on CT images. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop a CT-less multi-tracer PET segmentation framework. MethodsWe collected 2062 PET/CT images from multiple scanners. The patients were injected with either 18F-FDG (1487) or 68Ga-PSMA (575). PET/CT images with any kind of mismatch between PET and CT images were detected through visual assessment and excluded from our study. Multiple organs were delineated on CT components using previously trained in-house developed nnU-Net models. The segmentation masks were resampled to co-registered PET images and used to train four different deep-learning models using different images as input, including non-corrected PET (PET-NC) and attenuation and scatter-corrected PET (PET-ASC) for 18F-FDG (tasks #1 and #2, respectively using 22 organs) and PET-NC and PET-ASC for 68Ga tracers (tasks #3 and #4, respectively, using 15 organs). The models performance was evaluated in terms of Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and segment volume difference. ResultsThe average Dice coefficient over all organs was 0.81{+/-}0.15, 0.82{+/-}0.14, 0.77{+/-}0.17, and 0.79{+/-}0.16 for tasks #1, #2, #3, and #4, respectively. PET-ASC models outperformed PET-NC models (P-value < 0.05). The highest Dice values were achieved for the brain (0.93 to 0.96 in all four tasks), whereas the lowest values were achieved for small organs, such as the adrenal glands. The trained models showed robust performance on dynamic noisy images as well. ConclusionDeep learning models allow high performance multi-organ segmentation for two popular PET tracers without the use of CT information. These models may tackle the limitations of using CT segmentation in PET/CT image quantification, kinetic modeling, radiomics analysis, dosimetry, or any other tasks that require organ segmentation masks.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
3
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
6
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
13
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
18
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
26
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
29
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%