Immunological profiles in Lynch syndrome colorectal cancers are not specific to mismatch repair gene defects
Helderman, N. C.; IJsselsteijn, M. E.; Cabuta, M.; van der Ploeg, M.; van Wezel, T.; Ahadova, A.; Kloor, M.; Morreau, H.; Nielsen, M.; de Miranda, N. F. C. C.
Show abstract
Background and aimsColorectal carcinomas (CRCs) in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) exhibit heightened immunogenicity due to mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d), often resulting in favorable responses to T cell immune checkpoint therapies. Recent studies indicate that the phenotype and genotype of LS-associated CRCs vary depending on the specific MMR gene mutated. Here, we investigated whether the immune profiles of LS-associated CRCs differ based on the MMR gene defects. MethodsTissue material from 18 MLH1-, 16 MSH2-, 40 MSH6-, and 23 PMS2-mutated CRCs and 35 sporadic MMR-d CRCs were included in the study. Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) analysis, along with targeted multiplex immunofluorescence imaging (mIF) and immunohistochemistry, were applied to examine the tumor immune microenvironment, including Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. ResultsUnsupervised hierarchical clustering of cell phenotypes identified by IMC, followed by mIF validation, revealed comparable lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltration levels across CRCs from all MMR groups. Infiltrating T cell levels negatively correlated with the number of mutations at coding microsatellite sequences, particularly in MLH1-mutated CRCs. HLA class I defects were observed in 76% of all CRCs. These defects were more frequently accompanied by {beta}2M defects in hereditary MMR-d CRCs (67%) compared to sporadic MMR-d CRCs (37%), and did not associate with the number of {gamma}{delta} T cells, which were present in CRCs from all MMR groups. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was only detected in 8% of all CRCs. ConclusionOur findings illustrate that, from an immunological perspective, there is no evidence of differing immunogenic features across MMR defects. This is important to consider when developing preventive vaccine strategies and evaluating immunotherapy for LS patients and those with MMR-d CRCs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals the Effects of Chemotherapy on Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and its Tumor Microenvironment 95%
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 94%
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals ovarian cancer subclones with distinct tumour microenvironments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal single-cell profiling reveals cancer crosstalk between macrophages and stromal cells in poor prognostic cholangiocarcinoma patients. 94%
- Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Analyses of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Immune Architectures Associated with Clinical Outcome 94%
- Tumor break load quantitates structural variant-associated genomic instability with biological and clinical relevance across cancers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 96%
- Reversible Downregulation of HLA Class I in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma 96%
- Indication-specific tumor evolution and its impact on neoantigen targeting and biomarkers for individualized cancer immunotherapies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular Drivers of Tumor Progression in Microsatellite Stable APC Mutation-Negative Colorectal Cancers 95%
- Integrated genomics identify novel immunotherapy targets for malignant mesothelioma 94%
- Long-term maintenance of patient-specific characteristics in tumoroids from six cancer indications in a common base culture media system 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.