Invertebrate species distributions in urban ecosystems are driven by habitat availability, not by anthropogenic drivers
Morpurgo, J.; Remme, R. P.; Mudde, Q. D.; Didaskalou, E. A.; Serwatowska, K. J.; Trimbos, K. B.; Hu, M.; van Bodegom, P. M.
Show abstract
Rapid urbanisation puts pressure on biodiversity by habitat fragmentation and habitat quality among others. These habitat changes are known to affect species dispersal and connectivity and ultimately species distribution in many ecosystems. However, little is known about the changing urban species distributions which in turn influence community assembly. New DNA-based sampling methods combined with species distribution modelling provide a way to quantitatively estimate urban community assembly through assessing many species distributions and their drivers simultaneously. We investigated species distributions of entire communities in the city of The Hague (the Netherlands) by sampling DNA with two distinct methods: collecting data on invertebrate occurrence with traditional trapping (bulk; n = 205) and a novel Environmental DNA method (eDNA; n = 207). After DNA sequencing, species were identified using Operational Taxonomic Units. Subsequently, individual species presence and absence were used in Species Distribution Models (SDMs), based on spatial information on vegetation and anthropogenic influences. The results show a difference in coverage of sampling methods (bulk vs. eDNA), indicating their complementary information. The models on species distributions were generally significantly better than random models (59.5%), and performed well during calibration (90.4%, AUC > 0.70). In contrast, during validation very few SDMs (1.3%, AUC > 0.70) performed adequately in predicting species distributions. Through this novel combination of DNA sampling with SDMs we show that density and structure of vegetation, as well as distance to water are more important for urban invertebrate distribution than direct anthropogenic pressures. This suggests that dispersal is not a limiting factor in The Hagues urban environment. The availability of a variety of urban green infrastructures seems sufficient to attract many of the species observed. Hence, ensuring sufficient green infrastructure in the urban environment should be the first priority to enhance biodiversity in the urban environment. HighlightsO_LIVegetation and water indicators are the most important predictors for accurate assessment of species distribution C_LIO_LIAnthropogenic pressures have lower impact on urban species distributions C_LIO_LIDNA-SDM combinations show potential in guiding urban planners in evidence-based decision making C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sampling from commercial vessel routes can capture marine biodiversity distributions effectively 95%
- How citizen science could improve Species Distribution Models and their independent assessment 94%
- Novel frontier in wildlife monitoring: identification of small rodent species from faecal pellets using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity 95%
- Sounds of the underground reflect soil biodiversity dynamics across a grassy woodland restoration chronosequence 95%
- City climate and landscape structure shape pollinators, nectar and transported pollen along a gradient of urbanization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA is more effective than hand sorting in evaluating earthworm biodiversity recovery under regenerative agriculture 94%
- Trade of commercial potting substrates: A largely overlooked means of the long-distance dispersal of plants 93%
- Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SSP: An R package to estimate sampling effort in studies of ecological communities 94%
- Projecting spatiotemporal bioclimatic niche dynamics of endemic Pyrenean plant species under climate change: how much will we lose? 94%
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.