Back

Extinction probabilities of small structured populations: adequate short-term model predictions in Folsomia candida

Van Dooren, T. J.; Haccou, P.; Tully, T.; Hermus, G.

2024-08-26 ecology
10.1101/2024.08.26.609669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population management requires predictions of extinction risk based on a general understanding of these risks and on system-specific modelling. Life tables, available for numerous populations and species, permit calculating population growth and the construction of multi-type branching process models which predict population survivorship and ultimate extinction probabilities. We exemplify this approach and tailor it to an experimental model to predict extinction probabilities per unit of time. In age-structured populations, founders from different age classes lead to different predicted extinction probabilities. Age effects interact with environmental effects such as culling levels, which influence population growth rates. We assess the accuracy of predictions based on an age-structured matrix model, in an extinction experiment over an eight-week period on the springtail Folsomia candida, with crossed founder age and culling level treatments. Using parameter estimates from an accessory experiment, the fit of model predictions to observed extinction probabilities was generally good. A modified branching process model which allowed culling events between and at observations reduced prediction error. However, additionally maximizing the likelihood of observed extinction probabilities based on survival and fecundity parameters, or on a parameter which concentrated fecundity within a subinterval, did not significantly reduce prediction error according to the AICc. Our study shows that satisfactory predictions of establishment probabilities and of the initial persistence of small populations can be made using multi-type branching processes and available parameter estimates. Predictions can be improved by integrating knowledge of when events occur within intervals. This can be done without additional parameter estimation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
4
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
7
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
13
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
21
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
28
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%