Back

Rapid and robust identification of sepsis using SeptiCyte RAPID in a heterogenous patient population

Balk, R.; Esper, A. M.; Martin, G. S.; Miller, R. R.; Lopansri, B. K.; Burke, J. P.; Levy, M.; Rothman, R. E.; d'Alessio, F. R.; Sidhaye, V. K.; Aggarwal, N. R.; Greenberg, J. A.; Yoder, M.; Patel, G.; Gilbert, E.; Parada, J. P.; Afshar, M.; Kempker, J. A.; van der Poll, T.; Schultz, M. J.; Scicluna, B. P.; Klein-Klouwenberg, P. M. C.; Liebler, J.; Blodget, E.; Kumar, S.; Mei, W.; Navalkar, K.; Yager, T. D.; Sampson, D.; Kirk, J. T.; Cermelli, S.; Davis, R. F.; Brandon, R. B.

2024-08-28 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.08.26.24312552 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectiveSeptiCyte RAPID is a transcriptional host response assay that discriminates between sepsis and non-infectious systemic inflammation (SIRS) with a one-hour turnaround time. The overall performance of this test in a cohort of 419 patients has recently been described [Balk et al., J Clin Med 2024, 13, 1194]. In this study we present results from a detailed stratification analysis in which SeptiCyte RAPID performance was evaluated in the same cohort across patient groups and subgroups encompassing different demographics, comorbidities and disease, sources and types of pathogens, interventional treatments, and clinically defined phenotypes. The aims were to identify variables that might affect the ability of SeptiCyte RAPID to discriminate between sepsis and SIRS, and to determine if any patient subgroups appeared to present a diagnostic challenge for the test. Methods1) Subgroup analysis, with subgroups defined by individual demographic or clinical variables, using conventional statistical comparison tests. 2) Principal component analysis and k-means clustering analysis, to investigate phenotypic subgroups defined by unique combinations of demographic and clinical variables. ResultsNo significant differences in SeptiCyte RAPID performance were observed between most groups and subgroups. One notable exception involved an enhanced SeptiCyte RAPID performance for a phenotypic subgroup defined by a combination of clinical variables suggesting a septic shock response. ConclusionsWe conclude that for this patient cohort SeptiCyte RAPID performance was largely unaffected by key variables associated with heterogeneity in patients suspected of sepsis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
2
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
8.6%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
10
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%