Back

msiFlow: Automated Workflows for Reproducible and Scalable Multimodal Mass Spectrometry Imaging and Immunofluorescence Microscopy Data Processing and Analysis

Spangenberg, P.; Bessler, S.; Widera, L.; Bottek, J.; Richter, M.; Thiebes, S.; Siemes, D.; Krauss, S.; Migas, L. G.; Kasarla, S. S.; Phapale, P.; Kleesiek, J.; Fuehrer, D.; Moeller, L. C.; Heuer, H.; Van de Plas, R.; Gunzer, M.; Soehnlein, O.; Soltwisch, J.; Shevchuk, O.; Dreisewerd, K.; Engel, D. R.

2024-08-26 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.08.24.609403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multimodal imaging by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI MSI) and immunofluorescence microscopy holds great potential for understanding pathological mechanisms by mapping molecular signatures from the tissue microenvironment to specific cell populations. However, existing open-source software solutions for analysis of MALDI MSI data are incomplete, require programming skills and contain laborious manual steps, hindering broadly applicable, reproducible, and high-throughput analysis to generate impactful biological discoveries across interdisciplinary research fields. Here we present msiFlow, an accessible open-source, platform-independent and vendor-neutral software for end-to-end, high-throughput, transparent and reproducible analysis of multimodal imaging data. msiFlow integrates all necessary steps from import and pre-processing of raw MALDI MSI data to visual analysis output, as well as registration, along with state-of-the-art and newly developed algorithms, into automated workflows. Using msiFlow, we unravel the molecular heterogeneity of leukocytes in infected tissues by spatial regulation of ether-linked phospholipids containing arachidonic acid. We anticipate that msiFlow will facilitate the broad applicability of MSI in the emerging field of multimodal imaging to uncover context-dependent cellular regulations in disease states.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.