Pelvic floor health in athletics: a cross-sectional study at the Lima World Athletics U20 Championships
Giagio, S.; Bermon, S.; Garrandes, F.; Rial Rebullido, T.; Pillastrini, P.; Vecchiato, M.; Adami, P. E.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate various aspects of pelvic floor health among male and female athletes participating in the Lima World Athletics U20 Championships. MethodsThis observational, cross-sectional study will be conducted through a web-based survey via SurveyMonkey. The survey will collect demographic and anthropometric data, as well as medical history, including any injuries to the lower abdomen or pelvic area and history of urinary tract infections. It will also gather information on athletics-related characteristics, such as event specialization, training intensity, and competition volume. Additionally, the survey will explore pelvic floor health by assessing athletes knowledge of pelvic floor function and dysfunctions, as well as related behaviors. The prevalence rates of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) --including urinary and anal incontinence, pelvic pain, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse--will be assessed, along with their impact on sports participation and potential risk factors. Urinary incontinence will be further evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short-Form (ICIQ-UI-SF), with a focus on identifying specific triggers related to athletic activities. Participants will also provide information about their experiences with pelvic floor screening, discussions about these issues, symptom management strategies, and any medical assessments or treatments they have received. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup analyses. Correlation between collected variables and the presence of PFD will be investigated using correlation analyses. ConclusionThe findings from this study will provide valuable insights into the unique challenges faced by young elite athletes concerning pelvic floor health. This research represents an initial step toward an international initiative, promoted by World Athletics, to enhance pelvic floor health surveillance and promote overall well-being in athletics.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of Indigenous peoples living with pelvic health conditions: A scoping review 95%
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis 95%
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study on the feasibility of application of nutritional ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutritional risk at hospital discharge: Study on body composition and function (DRECO) 94%
- Athletes’ access to, attitudes towards, and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 97%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Study with 637 Brazilian Women 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 91%
- Non-Consensual Sex among Japanese Women in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Large-Scale Nationwide Survey-Based Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.