Back

Selective enrichment of specific bacterial taxa in downy mildew-affected spinach: Comparative analysis in laboratory and field conditions

Goossens, P.; Baremans, K.; Alderkamp, M.; Boshoven, J. C.; Van den Ackerveken, G.; Berendsen, R.

2024-08-23 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.23.609345 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants host diverse microbial communities that can be influenced by their hosts to mitigate biotic stress. Previous research demonstrated that distinct laboratory cultures of Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa) on Arabidopsis thaliana, consistently harbor nearly identical bacteria. In this study, we analyzed the bacterial phyllosphere communities of laboratory-grown spinach plants infected by the downy mildew pathogen Peronospora effusa (Pe). Using 16S amplicon sequencing, we identified 14 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs), with diverse taxonomies, that were enriched in at least 3 out of 5 investigated Pe cultures. This small set of 14 ASVs occupied on average 6.9% of the total bacterial communities in healthy spinach plants, and 43.1% in Pe-inoculated plants. A specific Rhodococcus and a Paenarthrobacter ASV were particularly prevalent and abundant. To validate these findings outside of the laboratory, we planted a susceptible variety of spinach in 4 agricultural fields and sampled leaves from Pe-infected plants in 2 fields where this pathogen naturally occurred. Comparative microbiome analysis of diseased and healthy plants revealed significant enrichment of 16 and 31 ASVs in these 2 fields, respectively. Among these, the Paenarthrobacter ASV was enriched in one field and the Rhodococcus ASV in the other field, suggesting that disease-associated microbiota that are abundantly detected in Pe laboratory cultures are also associated with Pe-infected field plants. Additionally, we observed an overlap of ASVs that were associated with both Pe and Hpa, indicating that similar bacteria are linked to downy mildew disease across different hosts.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.0%
3
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.0%
5
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
6.0%
7
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
8
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
9
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
13
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
18
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
19
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
20
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
21
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
23
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
24
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
25
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
27
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%