We need to feel that the Government value our lives: Examining Irish women's experience of cervical screening services
McGregor, R.; Foley, S.
Show abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the top three cancers diagnosed in women globally. When women have access to a testing programme, abnormal cells can be detected to prevent the development of cancer. Research to date indicates that social and cultural barriers are the top two barriers in accessing cervical screening. In Ireland there may be a lack of trust in the National Cervical Screening programme due to previous mishandling of tests, and media coverage of the impacts of inaccurate screening results in Ireland. To understand impact of the health scandal on womens trust in cervical screening in Ireland, nine Irish women ages between 25-65 were interviewed. Data was thematically analysed using a feminist perspective to centre the womens voices in making sense of their appraisal and engagement with services. The data analysis resulted in four themes: Personal Reflections on Systemic Failure; Collective Concern and Blame; Decision Making Influencers and Rebuilding Knowledge and Trust. This analysis conveys distrust in the Irish Cervical Screening programme, feelings of anger, and a sense of neglect from the services. Irish women now place their trust in each other, the experience of their friends, families, their local GP. We discuss these finding to explore how Irish women have reinterpreted the narrative over the screening test in Ireland, and the potential to decrease concern around the topic by incorporating this experience into official narratives. This scandal heightened existing distrust and concern for the quality of womens screening services, and therefore has global relevance which can be applied to screening services more generally.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 96%
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 96%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 96%
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 95%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 95%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 96%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 95%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 97%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 95%
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.