Leveraging Large Language Models for Identifying Interpretable Linguistic Markers and Enhancing Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostics
Mo, T.; Lam, J.; Li, V.; Cheung, L.
Show abstract
Alzheimers Disease (AD) is a progressive irreversible neurodegenerative disorder. Early AD detection is crucial for timely intervention. This study proposes a novel LLM framework to identify interpretable linguistic markers from LLMs and incorporate them to supervised AD detection transformers, while evaluating corresponding model performance and interpretability. Our work carries three major novelties: First, we design in-context Few-Shot and Zero-Shot prompting strategies to facilitate LLMs in summarising the high-level linguistic markers discriminative of AD from Normal Control (NC), providing interpretation and assessment of their strength, reliability and relevance for AD classification. Second, we incorporate LLM-summarised linguistic markers into a smaller transformer model to enhance the performance of AD detection. Third, we investigate whether the LLM-summarised linguistic markers can enhance accuracy and interpretability of our downstream supervised transformer model when used with the original speech transcripts. Our findings have shown that using LLM-summarised linguistic markers solely may yield lower accuracy using supervised learning, while combining these markers with the features extracted from the original speech transcripts can enhance the AD detection models diagnostic capabilities. Our hybrid speech-based AD detection framework capitalizes both the interpretability of linguistic markers and the rich information embedded within the original transcripts. When used as complementary features, the distinguishable AD linguistic markers have enhanced the AD detection performance, while providing clinically meaningful insights into speech-based AD detection. These insights have enabled healthcare professionals to gain deeper understandings about what linguistic variations have dictated individuals suffering from AD, enabling the clinical professionals to make more informed interventions and healthcare decision-makings.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty in Deep Learning for EEG under Dataset Shifts 91%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 91%
- Deep ensemble multitask classification of emergency medical call incidents combining multimodal data improves emergency medical dispatch 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- CharMark: A Markov Approach to Linguistic Biomarkers in Dementia 94%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 91%
- Large Language Models in Real-World Clinical Workflows: A Systematic Review of Applications and Implementation 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical Strategies for Extreme Missing Data Imputation in Dementia Diagnosis 93%
- Evaluating Explanations from AI Algorithms for Clinical Decision-Making: A Social Science-based Approach 92%
- Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.