COVER-ME: Developing and Evaluating community-based interventions to promote vaccine uptake in East London minority ethnicity (ME) populations; underserved migrants and persons with low income: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Chaudhry, T.; Tum, P.; Tam, H. Z.; Brentnall, A.; Smethurst, H.; Kielmann, K.; Kunst, H.; Hargreaves, S.; Campbell, C.; Griffiths, C. J.; Zenner, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionUnder vaccination amongst underserved groups remains low due to existing disparities. This is particularly the case with post-pandemic COVID-19 vaccinations, and other vaccine-preventable diseases including measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) or influenza. Therefore, we aim to 1) to determine the feasibility and practicality of implementing a patient engagement tool (PET) and gain vital insights to plan a subsequent definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of this tool for increasing uptake of COVID-19 and Flu vaccination; 2) and to define the appropriate level of support needed for health care providers at site-level to ensure successful implementation of the PET and to identify supporting activities needed to implement interventions for COVID-19 and Flu vaccinations. Methods and AnalysisThis is a randomised controlled feasibility study evaluating a co-designed PET, involving randomisation at individual and cluster level. For individual randomisation, patients will be individually randomised 1:1 to receive the intervention (PET) or routine care; whereas for cluster randomisation six GP practices will be randomised 1:1, and divided into two tranches at two separate time points. Both groups will receive training and activation of the software. Data will be analysed using statistical software R (4.0 or greater) or STATA (17 or greater). Baseline characteristics will be summarised and presented in groups based on an intention to treat (ITT) basis with categorical data; including demographics, socioeconomic variables, co-morbidities, and vaccination status. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval was granted Westminster Ethics Committee (ref: 316860). Our dissemination strategy targets three audiences: (1) Policy makers, public and health service managers and clinicians responsible for delivering vaccines and infection prevention services; (2) patients and public from underserved population groups (3) academics.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 96%
- Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study 96%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 96%
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 95%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 95%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 93%
- ReachUHC: A randomized controlled trial study protocol of a mobile phone-based reminder and automatic renewal intervention to increase health insurance renewal rates in Kumasi, Ghana 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines in Health and Social Care workers in England: a cohort study using OpenSAFELY 93%
- Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study) 93%
- Early effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector vaccine on symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality in older adults in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 91%
- Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Case-Finding Strategies: A Scoping Review Protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.