Back

Widespread environment-specific causal effects detected in the UK Biobank

Knusel, L.; Man, A.; Pare, G.; Kutalik, Z.

2024-08-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.08.21.24312360 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMendelian Randomization (MR) is a widely used tool to infer causal relationships. Yet, little research has been conducted on the elucidation of environment specific causal effects, despite mounting evidence for the relevance of causal effect modifying environmental variables. MethodsTo investigate potential modifications of causal effects, we extended two-stage-least-squares MR to investigate interaction effects (2SLS-I). We first tested 2SLS-I in a wide range of realistic simulation settings including quadratic and environment-dependent causal effects. Next, we applied 2SLS-I to investigate how environmental variables such as age, socioeconomic deprivation, and smoking modulate causal effects between a range of epidemiologically relevant exposure (such as systolic blood pressure, education, and body fat percentage) - outcome (e.g. forced expiratory volume (FEV1), CRP, and LDL cholesterol) pairs (in up to 337392 individuals of the UK biobank). ResultsIn simulations, 2SLS-I yielded unbiased interaction estimates, even in presence of non-linear causal effects. Applied to real data, 2SLS-I allowed for the detection of 182 interactions (P<0.001), with age, socioeconomic deprivation, and smoking being identified as important modifiers of many clinically relevant causal effects. For example, the positive causal effect of Triglycerides on systolic blood pressure was significantly attenuated in the elderly whilst the positive causal effect of Gamma-glutamyl transferase on CRP was intensified in smokers. ConclusionWe present 2SLS-I, a method to simultaneously investigate environment-specific and non-linear causal effects. Our results highlight the importance of environmental variables in modifying well-established causal effects.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
9
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%