Back

Machine Learning-Based Pixel-Level Quantification of Intramuscular Connective Tissue using Ultrasound Texture Analysis

Pincheira, P. A.; Kim, J. H.; Hodges, P. W.

2024-08-21 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.08.21.24312346 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a machine learning method for characterizing muscle composition on ultrasound imaging, focusing on pixel-level quantification of connective tissue using texture analysis. MethodsUltrasound images of the multifidus muscle from 20 healthy young adults were included in the analysis. Texture features including Local Binary Patterns, Histograms of Oriented Gradients, Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix, and Discrete Wavelet Transforms, were extracted from the images across multiple scales. Within a positive-unlabeled machine learning framework, two competing models, Bagging Support Vector Machine and Random Forests with Recursive Greedy Risk Minimization were trained for each texture and scale. The outputs of the texture-based pixel-level classification were compared to traditional echo intensity-based methods. Metrics such as the F-measure were employed to evaluate the models performance. Expert consensus was utilised to evaluate the accuracy of the classified images and identify the best-performing combination of model, texture, and scale. ResultsExpert evaluation identified the Bagging Support Vector Machine model trained with Local Binary Pattern histograms extracted at a scale of 9x9 pixel region of interest as the best combination for accurately classifying connective tissue-like pixels (F-measure= 0.88). The proposed method demonstrated high repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient= 0.92) and robustness to echo intensity variations, outperforming traditional echo intensity-based methods. ConclusionThis approach offers a valid method for pixel-level quantification of intramuscular connective tissue from ultrasound images. It overcomes the limitations of traditional analyses relying on echo intensity and demonstrates robustness against variations in echo intensity, representing an operator-independent advancement in ultrasound-based muscle composition analysis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.4%
4
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.7%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%