Back

Data acquisition strategies to reduce cardiac-induced noise in brain maps of R2* and magnetic susceptibility

Raynaud, Q.; Dardano, T.; Oliveira, R.; Di Domenicantonio, G.; Tobias, T.; Roy, C. W.; van Heeswijk, R. B.; Lutti, A.

2024-08-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.20.608759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maps of the transverse relaxation rate R2* and magnetic susceptibility () are computed from gradient- echo data acquired at multiple echo times and are sensitive to signal instabilities induced by cardiac pulsation. Here, we introduce two k-space sampling strategies that aim to mitigate the impact of cardiac-induced noise in brain maps of R2* and . The proposed strategies are based on the higher level of cardiac-induced noise near the k-space centre compared to the periphery. Using a CArtesian trajectory with Spiral PRofile (CASPR), the first strategy allows for the acquisition of a specific number of averages at each k-space location, derived from the local level of cardiac-induced noise. The second strategy synchronizes the acquisition near the k-space centre with the cardiac cycle in real time. We compared the variability across 4 repetitions of R2* and maps computed from data acquired using both strategies and with a standard linear trajectory. Data was acquired in 10 healthy volunteers. Compared to linear trajectory, the CASPR trajectory reduced the variability of R2* and maps across repetitions by 26/28/22% and 19/18/16% in the brainstem/cerebellum/whole brain, for a 14% increase in scan time. The CASPR trajectory also reduced the level of aliasing artifacts from pulsating blood vessels. The synchronized trajectory did not reduce the variability of R2* or maps. CASPR trajectories can be designed to mitigate cardiac-induced noise in brain maps of the MRI parameters R2* and . Synchronization of data acquisition with the cardiac cycle did not reduce the level of cardiac-induced noise.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.