Back

Rapid Whole Genome Characterization of High-Risk Pathogens Using Long-Read Sequencing to Identify Potential Healthcare Transmission

Wu, C.-T.; Shropshire, W. C.; Bhatti, M. M.; Cantu, S.; Glover, I. K.; Anand, S. S.; Liu, X.; Kalia, A.; Treangen, T.; Chemaly, R. F.; Spallone, A.; Shelburne, S.

2024-08-20 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.08.19.24312266 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveRoutine use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been shown to help identify transmission of pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, the current gold standard of short-read, Illumina-based WGS is labor and time-intensive. In light of recent improvements in long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing, we sought to establish a low resource utilization approach capable of providing accurate WGS-based comparisons of HAI pathogens within a time frame allowing for infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions. MethodsWGS was prospectively performed on antimicrobial-resistant pathogens at increased risk of potential healthcare transmission using the ONT MinION sequencer with R10.4.1 flow cells and Dorado basecalling algorithm. Potential transmission was assessed via Ridom SeqSphere+ for core genome multilocus sequence typing and MINTyper for reference-based core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms using previously published cut-off values. The accuracy of our ONT pipeline was determined relative to Illumina-based WGS data generated from the same genomic DNA sample. ResultsOver a six-month period, 242 bacterial isolates from 216 patients were sequenced by a single operator. Compared to the Illumina gold-standard data, our ONT pipeline achieved a Q score of 60 for assembled genomes, even with a coverage rate of as low as 40X. The mean time from initiating DNA extraction to complete genetic analysis was 2 days (IQR 2-3.25 days). We identified five potential transmission clusters comprising 21 isolates (8.7% of all sequenced strains). Combining ONT WGS data with epidemiological data, >70% (15/21) of the isolates originated from patients with potential healthcare transmission links. ConclusionsVia a stand-alone ONT pipeline, we detected potentially transmitted HAI pathogens rapidly and accurately, aligning closely with epidemiological data. Our low-resource method has the potential to assist in the efficient detection and deployment of preventative measures against HAI transmission.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
13
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
22
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%