Social and health conditions that drive the need, demand, utilisation and expenditure on social care in the United Kingdom: a protocol for a systematic review
Amies-Cull, B.; Shepperd, S.; Roberts, N.; Mason, A.; Bojke, L.; Clarkson, P.; Scott, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundSocial care is the personal and practical assistance provided to individuals in their daily activities, personalised around their circumstances to promote wellbeing. It is provided by formal and informal carers, with formal care supported by considerable public resources through the Adult Social Care function of local authorities. While it is a matter of great public and policy concern that the system better meet peoples needs and that public finances are not unsustainably strained, some key drivers of adult social care need, such as the relationships between age, social determinants, environmental conditions, and health status are not well understood at the system level. This is a protocol for a systematic review of the evidence to determine the health and social drivers that contribute to adults need and demand for and utilisation of social care in the UK, and how these interact. MethodsWe will include quantitative studies of any experimental, observational or simulation/modelling design with average participant age [≥]60, that examine the relationships between health status and/or social conditions, and their impact on adult social care need, demand, utilisation and expenditure. Informal and formal domiciliary, residential and nursing care, professional social work and occupational therapy will be included. Medline, CINAHL, EconLit, ASSIA Campbell Collaboration and grey literature will be searched. A single reviewer will screen titles/abstracts for eligibility, and two reviewers will independently screen the full-text of studies initially considered eligible. 15% of the included studies will be double-extracted, and remainder single extracted with an accuracy check. Risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and ROBINS-I. The findings will be grouped by health condition(s), the type of determinant, outcome and will be presented in an evidence gap map. If three or more comparable studies are identified, we will consider calculating the effect size. We will use GRADE to assess the evidence certainty. DiscussionWe will detail the evidence on the relationships (to include an indication of their contribution) between health status and social conditions with the need, demand, utilisation and expenditure on adult social care in the UK, informing further analyses in key evidence gaps.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 96%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 96%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 93%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review 92%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 92%
- Excess mortality for care home residents during the first 23 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a national cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review 92%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.