Unlocking Protein Evolution Insights: Efficient and Interpretable Mutational Effect Predictions with GEMME
Carbone, A.; Laine, E.; Lombardi, G.
Show abstract
The Global Epistatic Model for predicting Mutational Effects (GEMME) is a computational method that reconstructs protein mutational landscapes using sequence data alone. In this article, we delve into the broader biological questions that GEMME can address beyond mere landscape reconstruction. We provide several examples to guide users in maximizing the utility of GEMME. Additionally, we discuss recent advancements that enhance GEMMEs predictive accuracy and extend its capabilities by integrating sequence data with structural information and allele frequency data, when available. These innovations enable GEMME to answer new biological questions and offer deeper insights into protein evolution and function.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing predictions of protein stability changes induced by single mutations using MSA-based Language Models 97%
- MutaFrame - an interpretative visualization framework for deleteriousness prediction of missense variants in the human exome 96%
- Scoring Protein Sequence Alignments Using Deep Learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- SAINT-Angle: self-attention augmented inception-inside-inception network and transfer learning improve protein backbone torsion angle prediction 96%
- Fast protein structure searching using structure graph embeddings 96%
- Estimating Protein Complex Model Accuracy Using Graph Transformers and Pairwise Similarity Graphs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Unified Protein Embedding Model with Local and Global Structural Sensitivity 96%
- SPRI: Structure-Based Pathogenicity Relationship Identifier for Predicting Effects of Single Missense Variants and Discovery of Higher-Order Cancer Susceptibility Clusters of Mutations 96%
- Regularly updated benchmark sets for statistically correct evaluations of AlphaFold applications 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.