Back

A Modeling Analysis on Eliminating Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV Incidence in the United States

Jacobson, E. U.; Viguerie, A.; Bates, L.; Hicks, K.; Honeycutt, A. A.; Carrico, J.; Lyles, C.; Farnham, P. G.

2024-08-16 hiv aids
10.1101/2024.08.15.24312083 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite progress in HIV prevention and treatment, resulting in overall incidence reductions in the United States, large racial/ethnic (r/e) disparities in HIV incidence remain due to stigma, discrimination, racism, poverty, and other social and structural factors. SettingWe used the HIV Optimization and Prevention Economics (HOPE) model to analyze which intervention strategies provide the most effective path towards eliminating r/e disparities in HIV incidence. MethodsWe considered four intervention scenarios for 2023-2035, which focused on eliminating r/e disparities by 2027 in the HIV care continuum only, HIV prevention services only, both continuum and prevention services, and a final scenario where prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino were set to maximum feasible levels. The primary outcome is the incidence-rate-ratio (IRR) for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations compared to Other populations (of whom 89% are White) with the goal of IRRs [≤] 1 by 2035. ResultsAll scenarios reduced IRRs but only Maximum Feasible eliminated HIV incidence disparities by 2035, with respective IRRs of 0.9 and 1.1 among the Black and Hispanic/Latino populations, compared to 6.5 and 4.1 in the baseline scenario. Continuum-only was more effective at reducing disparities (2035 IRRs of 4.7 for Black and 3.1 for Hispanic/Latino populations) than Prevention-only (6.1 and 3.7 respectively). ConclusionsWith no prioritized changes, our simulation showed that r/e disparities in HIV incidence persist through 2035. Elimination of r/e incidence disparities by 2035 is only possible if maximum HIV prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations can be realized by 2027.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%