Back

Applying a Random Forest Approach in Predicting Health Status in Carotid Artery Stenosis Patients 30 Days Post-Stenting

Qureshi, O.; Mena-Hurtado, C. I.; Romain, G.; Cleman, J.; Callegari, S.; Smolderen, K. G.

2024-08-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.08.14.24312025 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 20% of ischemic strokes in the U.S. result from carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) can reduce stroke risk, but variability in post-stenting health outcomes and their predictors are poorly understood. We examined 30-day post-CAS health status and derived its most important clinical predictors. MethodsThe SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry measured pre-procedural and 30-day health status for carotid artery stenosis patients undergoing transfemoral-CAS using the SF-36 or EQ-5D between 2010-2014. Four health status scores were calculated: SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), EQ-5D Index Value and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Random Forest models ranked 66 pre-procedural candidate variables by relative importance in predicting 30-day post-CAS health status, stratified by symptomatic status. Variables with highest importance were used to develop predictive multivariable linear regression models. Model accuracy was assessed via Out of Bag accuracy and R-square, respectively. ResultsHealth status was assessed using the SF-36 in 3,017 patients and EQ-5D in 3,390 patients. Random Forest models demonstrated high accuracy (86.7% - 95.2%) and identified nine key predictors of post-stenting health status: pre-procedural health status (RI 100%), Modified Rankin Scale (RI 26.2-76.5%), NIH Stroke Scale (RI 12.1-28.0%), history of stroke (RI 9.2- 19.8%), congestive heart failure (RI 12.3-19.7%), spinal immobility (RI 6.7-31.0%), diabetes mellitus (RI 8.1-32.9%), severe pulmonary disease/COPD (RI 13.8-45.6%), and non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (RI 8.4-32.4%). Multivariable linear regression models explained [~]36- 61% of health status variance, with the asymptomatic SF-36 PCS model explaining 61%. SF-36 PCS and MCS models outperformed EQ-5D Index Value and VAS models regarding R-square and visual fit of observed vs. predicted values. ConclusionsWe successfully derived prediction models for patient-centered outcomes following CAS which partially explained 30-day post-CAS health status outcomes. Pre-procedural health status, stroke scale scores, and medical comorbidities should be considered when discussing health status benefits in pre-CAS treatment decision discussions.

Published in Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.